Neglected to mention that I'd been getting fat over the holidays. Lotsa candy, back on the Slurpee train(like 5 or so a week), eating whatever I want whenever I want. I could see in my face that I was getting fat. The double-chin was starting to form and my face was even rounder than its usual.
I can usually guess pretty close to how much I weigh before I step on the scale--felt like 218, but ended up 213.4, so not too bad. Hard to believe the difference between me looking fat and not is about 12 pounds but there you have it.
So back to my shakes, chicken noodle soup, and broccoli and carrots until I'm less fat again.
---
So I got a sneak peak at that movie I "produced" a while back. The director wasn't happy with the color correction and wanted me to look at it, see if I had any suggestions. It's not the worst, but I see what some of the issues are.
The bigger issue is that he has a sequence that takes place scriptwise at night but they shot it during the day and he was hoping this guy could day-for-night fix it.
Problem is, it wasn't shot for day-for-night. You CANNOT show the sky if you want to do day for night. There's no way to turn a day sky into a night sky short of massive compositing that'll never look right.
And many of these shots are low, angled-up at a vast daytime sky. You can't just dim the picture, blue it up and desaturate and hope it's gonna look right. It won't. So my suggestion was to just add a line at some point to establish the people were in this place for a long time and now it's basically daybreak. Cheesy, but works better than bad day for night.
All in all it's not that bad. The director's improved in places--far less mismatched eyelines and line jumps. Has some good edits, but is about 15 minutes too long. There's a lot of walking that I advised cutting down.
I also am going to try to tweak an effect, but then have to color correct it to this new guy's look. Shouldn't be that tough, but time is tight for me right now.